Đề Thi Thử Tốt Nghiệp 2026 Tiếng Anh Online-Đề 13 Có Lời Giải

c-a-e-d-b

e-c-a-d-b

c-e-a-d-b

c-e-d-a-b

c-b-a

b-c-a

c-a-b

a-c-b

c-b-a-d-e

c-a-d-e-b

b-c-a-e-d

c-d-a-b-e

b-e-a-d-c

a-c-b-e-d

c-b-a-d-e

a-b-d-c-e

a-d-b-e-c

b-a-d-c-e

a-b-d-e-c

c-a-b-d-e

finalized

concluded

terminated

completed

an assortment

a quantity

a multitude

a volume

yet

and

so

for

spacious private oceanfront

private spacious oceanfront

oceanfront spacious private

private oceanfront spacious

upon

at

by

in

in

on

at

with

Chinese officials zealously guarded the proprietary methodologies employed in creating this valuable commodity from foreign acquisition

Proprietary methodologies remained concealed by Chinese officials, who prevented foreigners from accessing techniques for valuable material creation

Foreigners were systematically prevented from acquiring valuable materials, as Chinese officials safeguarded proprietary methodologies from external learning

Valuable materials emerged from proprietary techniques, access to which Chinese officials denied foreign entities

During the 751 Battle of Talas, Arab merchants encountered Chinese prisoners possessing papermaking expertise

Papermaking expertise transferred when Chinese prisoners, encountered by Arab merchants during the 751 Battle of Talas, possessed this knowledge

Arab merchants encountered Chinese prisoners conversant with papermaking methodologies during the Battle of Talas in 751

Papermaking techniques became known as Chinese prisoners encountered Arab merchants throughout the Battle of Talas in 751

Books achieved greater accessibility among scholars and students, whereas expensive parchment had previously constrained their distribution

Previously, expensive parchment had restricted distribution; books subsequently became more accessible to scholarly and student populations

Scholars and students gained enhanced book access, as expensive parchment’s previous distribution constraints were alleviated

Book distribution to scholars and students increased accessibility, while expensive parchment had previously imposed limitations

Despite digital communication platforms’ proliferation, educational institutions and commercial enterprises continue paper reliance

It facilitated education, governance, and commerce by furnishing an economical medium for information storage and transmission

Educational facilitation occurred through governance, which furnished commercial entities with economical information storage methodologies

An economical storage medium enabled education while facilitating governance provision to commercial enterprises

Paper utilization continues expanding despite commercial pressure, while educational institutions maintain digital communication platform reliance

Despite institutional preferences, commercial enterprises perpetuate paper reliance alongside digital communication platform adoption

Educational institutions and commercial enterprises maintain paper dependency notwithstanding digital communication platforms’ proliferation

Digital communication platforms drive commercial reliance, prompting educational institutions to continue paper utilization expansion despite them

at which

when

where

who

held

to hold

hold

being held

cooperate

cooperative

cooperation

cooperatively

enforcement

endorsement

endowment

entrenchment

signing

signed

to sign

having signed

draw up

put off

call for

take over

Enhancing security for sensitive information

Asserting national sovereignty over citizens’ data

Generating domestic jobs via in-country infrastructure

Reducing environmental footprints through greener data centers

requires

tolerates

broadcasts

reimburses

facilitated

hindered

obstructed

undermined

domestic systems inside the country

foreign regulators imposing deletion orders

replicated personal records stored in both locations

cloud providers operating sovereign regions

Certain regulations mandate that domestic deletion precedes foreign erasure to ensure compliance with sovereignty principles.

Some laws require erasing foreign copies only after local systems have removed the same residents’ data.

Some jurisdictions stipulate concurrent deletion across all locations to prevent regulatory arbitrage and data leakage.

Regulations in certain countries require synchronized erasure procedures, with domestic systems initiating the deletion sequence.

Data sovereignty and data localization are identical concepts and operate without legal distinctions.

Data may be transferred abroad first, then retroactively brought into compliance if users later consent.

Cross-border transfers usually follow local compliance steps, including notice and obtaining user consent.

Residency rules never require domestic processing before any storage occurs in a foreign jurisdiction.

Paragraph 1

Paragraph 2

Paragraph 3

Paragraph 4

Paragraph 1

Paragraph 3

Paragraph 4

Paragraph 2

several firms can exploit identical datasets without reducing anyone else’s usable supply

exclusive ownership rights always prevent duplication across interoperable digital markets

regulators must license a single controller to maintain scarcity and orderly competition

platforms necessarily destroy originals whenever purchasers request processed derivatives

ceremonial tribute

financial compensation

social recognition

contractual obligation

Historical labor unions illustrate how collective leverage can reclaim value from extractive intermediaries.

Wage exploitation vanished once factories improved conditions and mechanized most dangerous tasks.

Data traces have replaced labor entirely, making industrial precedents irrelevant to digital markets.

Individual bargaining power is adequate when platforms publish clear privacy policies and dashboards.

Platforms unilaterally define data, set prices, and exclude arbitrage that could balance valuations.

Users overshare information, causing unavoidable leakage regardless of governance or incentives.

Governments overregulate consent, dismantling innovative services and undermining entrepreneurship.

Cooperatives demand excessive fees, eroding member payouts and distorting normal market signals.

A browser data-union app

A European court ruling

A centralized ad exchange

A nonprofit trust

corporate greed

state censors

labor idleness

data scarcity

Should individuals refrain from wage bargaining entirely, platforms will proactively establish profit-sharing whenever processing behavioral telemetry, recognizing voluntary distribution enhances retention.

Absent traditional labor mobilization, communities may construct alternative revenue streams through coordinated information stewardship, effectively rechanneling surplus platforms previously appropriated.

Unless users maintain network participation, collective monetization pathways remain foreclosed because platforms retain ownership over interaction logs, rendering cooperatives legally unviable.

On condition regulators prohibit microtargeting, individuals can independently commercialize informational exhaust without cooperatives, as restrictions eliminate platforms’ asymmetric value derivation.

Recognition in EU law will likely legitimate data-union practices elsewhere by signalling feasibility, thereby accelerating experiments that blend policy, litigation, and tooling.

Data unions will obviate privacy law because collective bargaining inherently secures informed consent and renders statutory safeguards redundant across sectors.

Browser plugins alone can resolve mispricing, since transparent dashboards remove any need for courts, regulators, or collective governance structures.

Centralized platforms prefer third-party arbitrage because it simplifies accounting and usually increases the prices they must pay for user information.

[I]

[II]

[III]

[IV]

By treating data as labor, communities can unionise through policy, lawsuits, and technology to redirect value and secure a data dividend from powerful platforms.

Because data is infinite, markets cannot value it, so governments should nationalise datasets and prohibit private use to prevent corporate profiteering.

Traditional unions have no relevance to digital economies, which depend primarily on intellectual property, not collective bargaining or revenue-sharing mechanisms.

Litigation is the sole credible path to compensation; cooperatives and technical distribution tools add complexity without delivering measurable community benefits.